Office of Sponsored Research and Programs
An IRB application consists of a cover sheet and a narrative (which can be in outline form) that addresses specific issues about a research project. Enough information should be included to allow the IRB members to evaluate the project with regard to participant safety. If insufficient information is provided, or if the information provided is not clear enough to allow for a determination about participants safety, then the application may be returned to the PI, along with recommendations for improvement.
It is the IRB college representatives’ job to determine the level of review (exempt, expedited, or full board review) for the application, NOT THE RESEARCHER. While the labels for the levels of review can be somewhat confusing, “exempt” review simply means that a project is exempt from the full force of all Federal regulations, but is still subject to Missouri State University policies, and thus is required to be reviewed by at least one IRB member. By the same token, “expedited” review means that a project appears to have more than “minimal risk”, and (by MSU policy) requires two IRB members to review the application. So, in this instance, “expedited” does not refer to a faster processing of an application (the IRB tries to be as quick and efficient with all applications as possible).
The cover sheet should indicate who the PI is (which is always a faculty or staff member, even with student projects like theses) and other researchers involved. It should also indicate that all researches have completed the CITI Training, and the HIPAA training, if applicable. The project sheets should have the PI’s and relevant Department Head’s signatures affixed (thus, sending it via email may not be sufficient, unless signatures are included).
_______________________________ ______________________________
Department Head Principal Investigator (Faculty)
_______________________________ ______________________________
Other Investigators Other Investigators
Date: __________________________ Date: _________________________
3. Submit one completed application to the IRB representative for your college. The College Representatives can be found in the IRB Member section on the Office of Sponsored Research and Programs website. Applicants outside of the academic colleges should submit applications (PDF Doc; Opens in a new window) to the Staff Representative. It is suggested that an additional copy be retained by the applicant.
4. Wait for IRB Approval.
- A. Once the College IRB representative reviews an application they forward the application and their recommended designation on to the IRB Chair. If a full board review is required, the IRB Chair ensures that the application is distributed to all board members for review and schedules the time for the review meeting (either at the next regular IRB meeting or earlier, if necessary). If the College representative has given the application an exempt review classification, the application is sent directly to the Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP), and the project PI is sent an email letter acknowledging that their project has been approved by the IRB. See an example of a Confirmation Letter sent to a Principal Investigator.
(NOTE: The PI should safeguard this letter for possible later use. For instance, many more journals ask for a copy of a research project’s IRB approval before accepting a journal article for publication. Further, if an application pertains to a student thesis, the student is required by the Graduate College to submit a copy of the IRB approval letter along with their final draft of a thesis, or it will not be accepted.)- B. If the college representative gives an application an expedited review classification, the application is then sent to the IRB Chair for a second review. If the Chair concurs with the college representative’s evaluation of the application, then the Chair forwards the application on to the OSRP, who will then send out the email approval letter.
Project approval is for a maximum of one year, but can be renewed by PI’s by submitting a new application cover sheet (indicating the renewal status), along with any changes in the project since initial submission, directly to the IRB Chair. If a project protocol changes during the course of the project, the PI should submit these modifications (in writing) directly to the IRB Chair.
If, during the course of a project, adverse consequences of any sort befall research participants, the IRB Chair should be notified IMMEDIATELY, the project should be temporarily suspended (unless doing so would put other participants at risk), and a report of the incident should be submitted within 24 hours. An adverse event is any unexpected negative consequence for human participants, such as an unexpected side effect or after effect from a procedure, an injury as a result of participation in a project, the inadvertent release of confidential information, or other breach of confidentiality.
Important :
If you don't have Microsoft Word, you may download and install Microsoft Word Viewer free software to view *.doc documents.
If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader, you may download and install Adobe Acrobat Reader free software to view *.pdf documents.